Fullscreen Menu - Background

Subscribe to SME News Search for an article Our amazing team

Ground Floor, Suites B-D, The Maltsters,
1-2 Wetmore Road, Burton upon Trent
Staffordshire, DE14 1LS

Background
Posted 1st December 2017

Charging Forward in the Fight Against Chargeback Fraud

Charging Forward in the Fight Against Chargeback Fraud

Mouse Scroll AnimationScroll to keep reading
Fixed Badge - Right
charging forward in the fight against chargeback fraud.


Charging Forward in the Fight Against Chargeback Fraud
Image


Increasing numbers online sellers are becoming victims of mass fraudulent buying, new research from King’s Business School reveals. The researchers provide vital advice for users of e-commerce platforms like eBay on how to protect themselves.

Professor Stuart Barnes and his co-authors have created a conceptual plan that aims to reduce the huge losses online retailers suffer from chargeback fraud – which occurs when buyers claim a refund for purchased items without returning them, typically on the basis of unfounded excuses such as “items not delivered” or “transactions unauthorized”.

“With vast numbers of SMEs selling products and services online to buyers all over the world, Chargeback Fraud has become a growing and massive problem in global e-commerce. Billions of dollars are lost every year,” says Barnes, “yet existing research has focused on the notion that buyers are subject to opportunistic sellers.”

The researchers discovered an urgent need to protect sellers from the fraudulent behaviour of buyers – recommending lobbying and putting pressure on financial institutions to reduce lengthy chargeback periods. Currently, buyers can contact their banks to exploit a credit card protection policy that allows them to reverse charges for many months if they are not satisfied with the ordered items.

Based on a survey of over 400 online sellers on DHgate.com, one of the major cross-border e-commerce websites connecting SMEs in mainland China with overseas buyers, the researchers developed and tested a model that identifies a set of operational measures to enhance sellers’ trust and reduce their perceived risk, particularly through greater transparency of a buyer’s identity, signature mechanisms – such as smartphone fingerprint apps, and more effective tracking of goods in transit.

This is particularly important because, unlike face-to-face transactions in store where the credit card institutions take full responsibility in disputes, an online merchant is held accountable for the loss of delivered items despite measures taken to verify the transactions.

This research by King’s Business School was carried out with Hohai University, University of Alabama and Kent State University, and published in the Information Systems Journal. It offers business owners and interested parties valuable insights into how to avoid this increasingly prevalent problem.

Categories: Legal & Compliance, News


You might also like...
‘Most Turbulent Time Ever’ For Over A Third Of SMEs, As Experts Advise British Businesses To Prepare For Even Greater ChangeBusiness News13th January 2020‘Most Turbulent Time Ever’ For Over A Third Of SMEs, As Experts Advise British Businesses To Prepare For Even Greater Change

By the end of 2019, 2.6 million small business owners (46 percent) admitted to having genuine concerns about the future - so much so that a quarter believe their company will fold in the next five years, according to new research.

3 Reasons You Should Get Your MBABusiness Advice1st June 20203 Reasons You Should Get Your MBA
SME News Media Pack

Every quarter we offer a new issue of SME News which is published on our website, shared to our social media following and circulated to our opt-in subscribers from various sectors across the UK SME marketplace.

  • TickExpand your reach.
  • TickGrow your enterprise.
  • TickSecure new clients.
View Media Pack
Media Pack - Bottom Slant Gradient
we are sme.
Arrow